Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WABDL Canadian Deadlift Records
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - WP:NOT#STATS Black Kite 18:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WABDL Canadian Deadlift Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information or statistics, see WP:NOT#STATS, only references are to the organization itself. Terrillja talk 19:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note also note similar list: Wabdl canadian bench press records--Terrillja talk 20:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - poorly formatted is not a deletion criterion. WilyD 14:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#STATS, plus it lacks reliable independent sources to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - Strength Data is very important for the evolution of sports.24.82.151.229 (talk) 18:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - Especially if the info on this articles Discussion Page is added to this Article.24.82.151.229 (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even were it to be prettily formatted, there are no WP:RS including what is noted on the talk page. DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 07:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.