- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. henrik•talk 21:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Chat Avenue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no significant coverage under both names. Fails WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why this article is being deleted. The notability here is evident. Search up chat rooms online and you will find this site is among the top results. It is one of the most populated and visited chat sites on the net, if not the most popular. I realize there is a lack of third party sources about it, however it is listed and referenced in Yahoo! and chat blogs. --Roomdown657 (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails notability guidelines and WP:WEB, as per nominator. doktorb wordsdeeds 20:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Appears non-notable. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 06:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.